Auditing an Oracle database for security issues is very important. PeteFinnigan.com provides all of the information and tools that you will need Click here for details of PeteFinnigan.com Limited's detailed Oracle database security audit service Click here for details of PeteFinnigan.com Limited's Oracle Security Training Courses
There are 63 visitors online    
Cookie Policy:We only use essential cookies on small sections of this website. For details see here.

Pete Finnigan's Oracle security weblog


Home » Archives » March 2009 » IOUG Critical Patch Update Survey Results Are Out

[Previous entry: "A new version of woraauthbf is available (The Oracle password cracker)"] [Next entry: "Presentation on using VPD in the real world available"]

IOUG Critical Patch Update Survey Results Are Out

March 2nd, 2009 by Pete


I got an email last week from the IOUG to indicate that the long awaited results from the survey last year on CPU's are out. I promoted the survey a couple of times last year when it still had some time to run.

I am not going to go into detail on the results as they are contained in a 10 page pdf that you can download yourselves. Simply go to this link on the IOUG site and download the pdf from the link there.

It is interesting that the survey matches the discussions I have quite often with clients, people at conferences, SIG's and almost where-ever I go. People are always wanting views on CPU applications - or not! - the application that is. I always say two things. 1) CPU's are only part of the problem of securing an Oracle database - that is to be secure you cannot just apply a CPU, you must do all of the other work to secure the database, configuration, privileges, access, audit.... much, much more and 2) at the end of the day; taking out all of the issues, you can either apply a CPU or not, its simple. Well its simple to say but in practice, psycologically, reallity, its often hard to do for lots of reasons, mostly availability, performance, downtime, stability... This is one of the key conclusions found by the survey BUT I already new this. I also like the first conclusion and agree with it. If there was a way to make it more formal to apply patches then it would be better for security, but as discussed above it wouldnt secure the database (because security is not just patches) and also it would not fix the perception/reality of stability, availability etc. This is a very complex problem to fix; in part due to the complexity of the Oracle software, the large number of platforms, applications, configuration options....

The survey also showed that 30% of respondents patch within the quarter BUT 70% don't! We have seen a lot of improvement since the first security alerts 8 years ago but we still clearly have a long way to go to get people to patch in the quarter.

Good survey, good comments and conclusion and I think it reflects the reallity that I get to see and also that I am talked to about regularly.

Lets have another annually and lets see if we can get improvements.

March 2009
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

This is the weblog for Pete Finnigan. Pete works in the area of Oracle security and he specialises in auditing Oracle databases for security issues. This weblog is aimed squarely at those interested in the security of their Oracle databases.

Weblog Home
Weblog Archives


Home
Oracle Security Tools page
Oracle security papers
Oracle Security alerts

Web Development
SQL Server Security

RSS 1.0 FEED
RSS 2.0 FEED
Atom 0.3 FEED
Powered by gm-rss 2.0.0


Valid XHTML 1.0!